An Obama Cartoon from the Times
NPR’s IQ
The Litmus test of NPR’s intelligence…
On August 18, 2008, Jonathan Capehart sitting in for Leonard Lopate Show – WNYC , http://www.WNYC.org (212 433 9292) [NPR’s outlet in NY] interviewed in the last part of of the first hour Liz from ‘The Daily News’, first Liz brushed off any doubts if NY Yorkers are behind Hillary, “everybody is for NY” – she “decided”, yet, Jonathan in his desperation and worry that Mccain might win NY (NPR is independent” of course…), asked her “but… there’s no chance Mccain can win NY, Right?” Liz was “struggling” with Obama’s loss from 20% to 10% then tried to spin about it suddenly she came up with a most stupid answer: “Mccain doesn’t even have an office here… his headquarters is based in NJ”… oh boy, is she that silly that she believes people don’t notice the childish “reasoning” of it? How far really is NJ from NY? NYC almost borders with NJ!
It’s almost like saying, Richardson VS. Dallas TX, La Jolla VS San Diego CA, Palo Alto VS San Jose CA, Fort Lauderdale VS Miami FL, Skokie VS Chicago IL, etc.
Even though they are two separate states, it’s more like Cincinnati OH VS Louisville KY.
For Jonathan it was “enough”, he was not only satisfied but so happy, thus ended the interview.
Technorati – ‘palestinian’ terrorism ‘palestinians’ Israel IDF ‘palestinian’ Apartheid Zionism Anti Israel bigotry Islamic Apartheid War on terror Terror victims ‘palestinian’ propaganda jihad Genocide bombing Anti Israel bias Arab racism Jews IDF Anti Israel racism Islamofacsism Conflict Israel “Palestine” “Palestinians” Israelis Civilwar Arabs MuslimsJihad Terrorism Fatah non-Muslims Christians Hamas Gaza Terrorism Islamofascism Islamofascism Mccain Obama NPR Jerusalem Muslims
Infamous Nation of Islam’s Louis Farrakhan ‘warning’ for America if Obama loses…
Nation Of Islam’s Lois Farrakhan on the radio [WPAT AM] August 17 2008 [around 5:39 PM]: “If Obama loses fair and square OK, but if not… there will be some consequences…”
1) Will Farrakhan ever say that it was fair and square?
2) What does he mean by consequences, Is he calling for a violent bloody riot (again)?
While his past/present hatred is really troubling, even though he became more sophisticated in his language, yet, I am glad that through his tremendous efforts to hide his venom he is still so transparent when he always talks about “them” & “they”, he includes in the “they” – the enemy: Policemen, just white folks, business, etc.,
________
Related:
Leader of the Nation of Islam
Orchestrated the 1995 “Million Man March”
Renowned for his hatred of whites and Jews
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1325
Farrakhan Exposed!
The Truth About America’s Islamic Leader…
Recently America’s Islamic leader Louis Farrakhan made the insane statement that the reason so many people died in New Orleans was because the flooding was a deliberate plot by the White man to kill Black people
http://www.johnnyleeclary.com/farrakhan.htm
Funding Islamic hate… re: — Farrakhan and his hate is typical of
mainstream Arabic Islam.
http://wnd.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=22069
Michelle Obama and Louis Farrakhan Take On Whitey
http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/02/michelle-obama-and-louis-farrakhan-take-on-whitey/
For nearly 30 years, Louis Farrakhan has marked himself a notable figure on the extremist scene by making hateful statements targeting Jews, whites…
http://www.adl.org/special_reports/farrakhan_own_words2/farrakhan_own_words.asp
LOUIS FARRAKHAN CONDEMNS AMERICA AND THE JEWS On Tour, ADL Reports an ‘Itinerary of Hate’ Minister Farrakhan announced in … the Sudan has become a launching pad for Islamic extremist terrorism. …
http://www.adl.org/presrele/NatIsl_81/2686_81.asp
Technorati – Freedom 911 Al Qaida Obama Mccain NOI Lois Farrakhan Al Qaida Bin Laden Islamofascism Islam Apes and pigs Terrorism Terrorist oganization Hamas ‘palestinians’ Al Aqsa Alaqsa Muslims Christians Jews Arabs bombing Infidels Israel US Security Jihad War on Terror Iraq Iran Mosque Foreign policy West non Muslims Democracy Sudan Afghanitsan Islamic Threat Nukes Taliban Islamists
THE DISGUSTING [‘APPEASEMENT’] SONG BY NPR
August 11, 2008
What is it about the bad guys that provoke “compassion” from NPR type of journalists?
Regarding the case against Bin Laden’s driver: Salim Hamdan, though only having a short time to serve under the current verdict, he still might be held indefinitely according the Bush’s administration as an ‘enemy combatant’, John Mcchesni of NPR ‘lamented’ that the jury will be very disappointed if that happens.
Juror Questions U.S. Pursuit Of Salim Hamdan : NPR’s John McChesney has this exclusive interview …
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=93483533
Rhetorical question, Does Mr. Michesni think that these type of Bin Laden associates are innocent? or harmless or would spare him, given the chance?
Do NPR journalists receive a course of “singing it in a phony compassion mode” for those that do not deserve it?
Just like the infamous biased NPR “sing” it on those “poor” ‘Palestinian’ violent thugs, when Israel dares to defend itself against Islamists who seek only to carry out more massacres.
http://nprsucks.com/, http://www.nprbias.com/ – find
your local National Palestinian Radio Station.
Again, it’s the same Islamists ideologists that would have any westerner to
‘kneel or die’, ‘Convert or die’, just as they did with the Steve Centanni Wiig
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/08/27/news/mideast.php,
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,210767,00.html.
Or: Christian woman ‘forced to convert to Islam’ by Palestinians
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57019
Technorati – ‘palestinian’ terrorism ‘palestinians’ Israel IDF ‘palestinian’ Apartheid Zionism Anti Israel bigotry Islamic Apartheid War on terror Terror victims ‘palestinian’ propaganda jihad Genocide bombing Anti Israel bias Arab racism Jews IDF Anti Israel racism Islamofacsism Conflict Israel “Palestine” “Palestinians” Israelis Civilwar Arabs MuslimsJihad Terrorism Fatah non-Muslims Christians Hamas Gaza Terrorism Islamofascism
Where your tax money goes – to Liberal BS PBS
[August, 2008]
Clean up the 20% garbage at the PBS! Do not mix them with the majority of ‘good programming’, the “news” and current “editorial”
parts are totally unprofessional!
The PBS & NPR problem of having one sided biased agenda whenever reporting or editorializing news and current
events.
PBS says it’s “independent”, Huh?
PBS has a banner about ‘Vote 2008’ that describes itself as “independent”.
TIMING:
Can anyone come up with an explanation why the next 2 “documentaries” had
to be aired just so close to the elections?
1) Last weekend [beginning of August 2008], liberal Bill Moyers was busy in
his [Frontline] program on Reed’s scandalous past (with Abramov), where at the
end of it he makes sure to finish off with a “warning” line that : Jack Reed is
sponsoring a John Mccain weekend, Is that an important of the ‘Frontline’
“objective” documentary? or is it blatant anti-Mccain propaganda?
2) After above Bill Moyers ‘Frontline’ PBS had another anti Republican
bombshell, a film called “Bush’s War“, I couldn’t see all of it but at least two
comments:
A: Each time there’s a difference of opinion and two sides of the
coins are being brought up, the narrator “picks” the one he chooses to be the
“decisive” line.
B: When he comes to the pivotal points in the Iraq violence
he chooses the words: “resistance”, never the suitable ‘terrorists’ (or
other) term of thugs’ crimes against humanity, that are targeting unarmed men,
women & children, this attempt to make these low life criminals look like
some “political” movements, is not only dis-reporting but despicable effort of
butchers’-ass-licking, of the lowest of its kind.
Again, you can’t help but wonder why these damning films where
aired so soon to the elections if not the obvious to make people nauseous
of the Republican party.
THE SPIN ABOUT OIL
On Sunday [August 10, 2008] the same Bill Moyers on his ‘Frontline’ he made
the issue brought up by Newsweek about the ‘poverty business’, the phenomenon
that people find to make money of off poverty and off the poor.
A great
matter and case you might say, yes, until he starts to project his left bias, as
he has his guests over that start complaining about [the Democrats and] Obama’s
failure in the economy, Bill Moyers tries to shift the atmosphere to bash Mccain
instead, after making sure the guests are brought to the wind of
anti-Republicans he (feels assured enough so) he then shows a clip (by Foxnews)
of Newt Gingrich that he projects that within announcement of drilling (Drill
here, drill now) the gas prices will automatically fall, as speculators of the
oil stocks would be effected by it.
[Immediately, there’s a banner on the bottom with the words “The oil drilling debate”, How did the case against making profiting off of
poverty get altered?]
Bill asks the guest Dean Baker (of “CEPR“) if
that’s true, Mr. Becker answers that the projective oil we will be able to “get”
is small, whether this is accurate or not is not the issue but, still he hasn’t
answered the point raised by Mr. Gingrich which is that psychologically, the gas
price will fall down as soon as news of drilling gets the ‘go ahead’.
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/08082008/transcript3.html
Of course one sided Bill Moyers didn’t repeat and refocused the question,
he doesn’t want to hear the true answer, much less, he doesn’t want the American
people to hear the truth, that’s PBS – BS for you.
Truth is that gas prices already started to go down because of Mccain
pro-drilling and influencing Obama to agree partially to it.
The truth is that the control of our money to PBS by one small group [when
it comes to “news” and “editorials”, too bad they mix it in
with good programming, that makes it all even more venomous] of radical
lefty “intellectuals” has been so unfair and so unjust for far too
long.