Posts Tagged ‘NPR’

NPR’s IQ

August 19, 2008

NPR’s IQ

The Litmus test of NPR’s intelligence…

On August 18, 2008, Jonathan Capehart sitting in for Leonard Lopate Show – WNYC , http://www.WNYC.org (212 433 9292) [NPR’s outlet in NY] interviewed in the last part of of the first hour Liz from ‘The Daily News’, first Liz brushed off any doubts if NY Yorkers are behind Hillary, “everybody is for NY” – she “decided”, yet, Jonathan in his desperation and worry that Mccain might win NY (NPR is independent” of course…), asked her “but… there’s no chance Mccain can win NY, Right?” Liz was “struggling” with Obama’s loss from 20% to 10% then tried to spin about it suddenly she came up with a most stupid answer: “Mccain doesn’t even have an office here… his headquarters is based in NJ”… oh boy, is she that silly that she believes people don’t notice the childish “reasoning” of it? How far really is NJ from NY? NYC almost borders with NJ!

It’s almost like saying, Richardson VS. Dallas TX, La Jolla VS San Diego CA, Palo Alto VS San Jose CA, Fort Lauderdale VS Miami FL, Skokie VS Chicago IL, etc.
Even though they are two separate states, it’s more like Cincinnati OH VS Louisville KY.

For Jonathan it was “enough”, he was not only satisfied but so happy, thus ended the interview.

Technorati –


Advertisements

THE DISGUSTING [‘APPEASEMENT’] SONG BY NPR

August 15, 2008

THE DISGUSTING [‘APPEASEMENT’] SONG BY NPR

August 11, 2008

What is it about the bad guys that provoke “compassion” from NPR type of journalists?

Regarding the case against Bin Laden’s driver: Salim Hamdan, though only having a short time to serve under the current verdict, he still might be held indefinitely according the Bush’s administration as an ‘enemy combatant’, John Mcchesni of NPR ‘lamented’ that the jury will be very disappointed if that happens.

Juror Questions U.S. Pursuit Of Salim Hamdan : NPR’s John McChesney has this exclusive interview …

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=93483533

Rhetorical question, Does Mr. Michesni think that these type of Bin Laden associates are innocent? or harmless or would spare him, given the chance?

Do NPR journalists receive a course of “singing it in a phony compassion mode” for those that do not deserve it?

Just like the infamous biased NPR “sing” it on those “poor” ‘Palestinian’ violent thugs, when Israel dares to defend itself against Islamists who seek only to carry out more massacres.

http://nprsucks.com/, http://www.nprbias.com/ – find
your local National Palestinian Radio Station.

Again, it’s the same Islamists ideologists that would have any westerner to
‘kneel or die’, ‘Convert or die’, just as they did with the Steve Centanni Wiig
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/08/27/news/mideast.php,
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,210767,00.html
.

Or: Christian woman ‘forced to convert to Islam’ by Palestinians
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=57019

Technorati –

 

Where your tax money goes – to Liberal BS PBS – Clean up the 20% garbage at the PBS! Do not mix them with the majority of ‘good programming’, the “news” and current “editorial”

August 11, 2008

Where your tax money goes – to Liberal BS PBS
[August, 2008]

Clean up the 20% garbage at the PBS! Do not mix them with the majority of ‘good programming’, the “news” and current “editorial”
parts are totally unprofessional!

The PBS & NPR problem of having one sided biased agenda whenever reporting or editorializing news and current
events.

PBS says it’s “independent”, Huh?

PBS has a banner about ‘Vote 2008’ that describes itself as “independent”.

TIMING:

Can anyone come up with an explanation why the next 2 “documentaries” had
to be aired just so close to the elections?

1) Last weekend [beginning of August 2008], liberal Bill Moyers was busy in
his [Frontline] program on Reed’s scandalous past (with Abramov), where at the
end of it he makes sure to finish off with a “warning” line that : Jack Reed is
sponsoring a John Mccain weekend, Is that an important of the ‘Frontline’
“objective” documentary? or is it blatant anti-Mccain propaganda?

2) After above Bill Moyers ‘Frontline’ PBS had another anti Republican
bombshell, a film called “Bush’s War“, I couldn’t see all of it but at least two
comments:
A: Each time there’s a difference of opinion and two sides of the
coins are being brought up, the narrator “picks” the one he chooses to be the
“decisive” line.
B: When he comes to the pivotal points in the Iraq violence
he chooses the words: “resistance”, never the suitable ‘terrorists’ (or
other) term of thugs’ crimes against humanity, that are targeting unarmed men,
women & children, this attempt to make these low life criminals look like
some “political” movements, is not only dis-reporting but despicable effort of
butchers’-ass-licking, of the lowest of its kind.

Again, you can’t help but wonder why these damning films where
aired so soon to the elections if not the obvious to make people nauseous
of the Republican party.

THE SPIN ABOUT OIL

On Sunday [August 10, 2008] the same Bill Moyers on his ‘Frontline’ he made
the issue brought up by Newsweek about the ‘poverty business’, the phenomenon
that people find to make money of off poverty and off the poor.
A great
matter and case you might say, yes, until he starts to project his left bias, as
he has his guests over that start complaining about [the Democrats and] Obama’s
failure in the economy, Bill Moyers tries to shift the atmosphere to bash Mccain
instead, after making sure the guests are brought to the wind of
anti-Republicans he (feels assured enough so) he then shows a clip (by Foxnews)
of Newt Gingrich that he projects that within announcement of drilling (Drill
here, drill now) the gas prices will automatically fall, as speculators of the
oil stocks would be effected by it.

[Immediately, there’s a banner on the bottom with the words “The oil drilling debate”, How did the case against making profiting off of
poverty get altered?]
Bill asks the guest Dean Baker (of “CEPR“) if
that’s true, Mr. Becker answers that the projective oil we will be able to “get”
is small, whether this is accurate or not is not the issue but, still he hasn’t
answered the point raised by Mr. Gingrich which is that psychologically, the gas
price will fall down as soon as news of drilling gets the ‘go ahead’.

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/08082008/transcript3.html

Of course one sided Bill Moyers didn’t repeat and refocused the question,
he doesn’t want to hear the true answer, much less, he doesn’t want the American
people to hear the truth, that’s PBS – BS for you.

Truth is that gas prices already started to go down because of Mccain
pro-drilling and influencing Obama to agree partially to it.

The truth is that the control of our money to PBS by one small group [when
it comes to “news” and “editorials”, too bad they mix it in
with good programming, that makes it all even more venomous]
of radical
lefty “intellectuals” has been so unfair and so unjust for far too
long.

Technorati –













































































]
 

Straight from the Horse’s mouth: NPR’s admission of unfairness – says media does NOT have to be fair!

August 6, 2008

Straight from the Horse’s mouth: NPR’s admission of unfairness – says media does NOT have to be fair!

August 5, 2008:First, the infamous “fair” NPR had a person a self proclaimed “expert” in energy.., in order to sweeten-up Obama’s argument and politics, claimed the usual nonsense that “nothing would effect the prices of oil” stating it over and over again, without any iota of evidence or logic of course, the “expert” even mentioned that “people are talking about inflating tires”, What a BS! as if no one knows that it was ONLY Barack Obama that flipped and spoke rubbish, What a cheap attempt to save his embarrassment, to legitimize a silly childish idea just because Obama said it thus became “sacred”, not to mention the shear blatant open lie as if many “ordinary people” are talking about it as a real idea.

I mean seriously, Who’s NPR working for anyhow, and why Do YOU & I have to pay for this BS ON PBS?

Then, [at around 17:15 PM] Daniel Schorr of NPR “analyzed” the criticism on media’s unfairness in journalism that came through the Mccain ad portraying Obama as a celebrity (like Paris Hilton etc.), he did quote sources showing the grossly imbalance in reporting Obama over Mccain, but went on an argument, the gist of it being, as (he thinks) it’s not a big deal, since the “same conservatives” have dominance on talk-radio.

In other words, it IS TRUE that the MEDIA IS BIASED, favoring Obama OVER Mccain but it’s OK.

First, What kind of a childish argument is that? Does two wrongs make a right? Second, perspective! What is the actual balance between the overwhelming LIBERAL power in hijacking the: written (like NYTimes, LATimes, WP, Chicago Tribune, Times, etc.) and visual (TV – all stations asides from FOX) media vs only radio?

Hence the liberals do admit the 99% media is terrible biased anti-conservatism and worse, they even justify it, that daring they are!

How stinky is that?

Technorati –













































































]