Archive for the ‘bias’ Category

The videotape where Islamofascism’s palestinian Khalidi is at with Obama

October 29, 2008

McCain Camp Demanding L.A. Times Release Obama-Khalidi Video

October 28, 2008 · Filed Under Barack Obama, Media

About six months ago the L.A. Times published a story about a dinner 5 years ago in Chicago to honor Rashid Khalidi. Khalidi is another one of Chicago’s famed ex-terrorists turned ‘respected scholar’. He’s known for his virulent anti-semitism and hatred for Israel, although as a former member of Yasser Arafat’s PLO, that’s certainly no surprise.

What’s also not surprising is that like the rest of Chicago’s high profile undesirables, Khalidi is a good friend of Barack Obama’s.

The L.A. Times story was about the going away party held for Khalidi as he was about to leave the Chicago area and take a job in New York.

According to the Times, a special tribute came during the dinner from Barack Obama. The article refers to Obama as “Khalidi’s friend and frequent dinner companion” who stood and said a few words.

A special tribute came from Khalidi’s friend and frequent dinner companion, the young state Sen. Barack Obama. Speaking to the crowd, Obama reminisced about meals prepared by Khalidi’s wife, Mona, and conversations that had challenged his thinking.

His many talks with the Khalidis, Obama said, had been “consistent reminders to me of my own blind spots and my own biases. . . . It’s for that reason that I’m hoping that, for many years to come, we continue that conversation — a conversation that is necessary not just around Mona and Rashid’s dinner table,” but around “this entire world.”

Suffice it to say that since his run for the presidency began, Obama hasn’t enjoyed any of Mona Khalidi’s cooking.

The article goes on to speculate that Obama has more sympathy for Palestinian grievances than he lets on. His presence at such dinners and other occasions where Jew bashing was taking place has led many in the Palestinian community to believe Obama has a sympathetic ear.

The reason a 6-month old article is being talked about now is because the L.A. Times acknowledges having videotape of the Khalidi dinner — but is refusing to release it.

The McCain campaign says the refusal to release a newsworthy video like that confirms their obvious bias.

“A major news organization is intentionally suppressing information that could provide a clearer link between Barack Obama and Rashid Khalidi,” said McCain spokesman Michael Goldfarb, citing Obama’s friendship with Khalidi, who is now a professor at Columbia University.

“The election is one week away, and it’s unfortunate that the press so obviously favors Barack Obama that this campaign must publicly request that the Los Angeles Times do its job — make information public,” he said.

It really does look pretty bad that the Times would refuse to release such a tape. I have a hard time believing if they had video of McCain attending a dinner for a Klansman they would be withholding it.

This really is par for the course when you look at the pathetic and despicable way the media has behaved throughout this campaign.

The Politico is even weighing in on the controversy and they too believe The L.A. Times should release the video.

Ben Smith from The Politico contacted the Times and their spokeswoman said this:

“When we reported on the tape six months ago, that was our full report,” she said, and asked, “Does Politico release unpublished information?”

Ben Smith answered in his column:

The answer to that question is yes — Politico and most news outlets constantly make available videos and documents, after describing them in part, which is why the Times’ decision not to release the video is puzzling. My instinct, and many reporters’, is to share as much source material as possible.

Critics have suggested that the Times is witholding the video for political reasons, but there are other possibilities: competitive reasons, or simply out of tradition. In the mechanics of reporting, there’s another possibility as well. The video may have been given to the paper on the condition it not be released, or releasing it could compromise its source.

But the Times hasn’t explained the move, and the McCain campaign is turning up the heat on a story that, whether or not the tape is released, is a reminder that some of Obama’s Hyde Park friends stand well to the left of his stated positions.

What this all boils down to is Barack Obama’s judgment in selecting friends. Since his college days, Barack Obama has chosen to associate with every Commie Pinko and left wing nut in Chicago and beyond.

Of course all these people were mere acquaintances — not really friends. Anyone who believes that is a sucker.

I don’t believe Barack Obama shares the same beliefs necessarily as Bill Ayres, but he clearly identifies with him in some way.

If Barack Obama went for a beer with friends after work in Chicago, people like Khalidi and Ayres would have been those friends. I certainly don’t hang around with a bunch of people I have nothing in common with, and I don’t know anyone who does.

Yet we’re supposed to believe that Obama palled around with every wackjob in Chicago, but doesn’t share any of their views? I don’t buy it.

If it was just a Bill Ayres or a Rashid Khalidi, or a Rev. Wright, or a Father Pfleger, or a Tony Rezko, that would be one thing. A lot of people have one crazy friend, so it wouldn’t really be an issue.

However, it’s the totality of friends that’s so damn troubling about Obama. Not one friend, but ALL his friends are radical far-left loons.

Nobody hangs around with that many Pinkos and has nothing in common with them.

The L.A. Times has a responsibility to release that tape and let the American people decide if it’s important or not.

-Chris Jones

<!–

–>

http://www.thehotjoints.com/2008/10/28/mccain-camp-demanding-la-times-release-obama-khalidi-video

, , , , , , , ,

Advertisements

Resume Of A Terrorist: Obama’s Buddy Ayers

September 3, 2008

Resume Of A Terrorist: Obama’s Buddy Ayers
by Jim Kouri

Published:
Sep 2, 2008

While the likes of the New York Times, Washington Post, ABC,
NBC, CBS, CNN and other news organizations have their reporters digging for dirt
on Alaskan Gov. Sarah Palin, John McCain’s choice for vice president, their
savior-in-waiting Barack Obama is getting a free ride at the expense of truth.

It’s no secret that the denizens of America’s newsrooms want Obama
sitting in the Oval Office, but Americans are being purposely duped by the
Democrat National Committee’s volunteer publicists, formerly known as the
mainstream news media.

If it weren’t for talk radio and the blogosphere,
even what is known about Obama and his friend, former Weather Underground
domestic terrorist and leader William Ayers, would only be a paragraph or two in
the backpages of most newspapers, or a sentence or two on most TV and radio news
programs.

On Friday night, one of America’s top talk show hosts — who
happens to be an attorney and worked in the Reagan Justice Department as chief
of staff — recited a list of terrorist acts that would elicit envy from Osama
bin Laden. Mark Levin had his listeners glued to their radios or PCs as he read
the resume of a man who should be serving life in prison instead of enjoying a
tenured professorship at a major university and entertaining a possible US
President in his home.

Because of so-called “prosecutorial misconduct”
Ayers escaped what could have been a life-sentence.

As I write this
“resume of a terrorist,” I find it difficult to understand how a man who is
running for president of the United States would even know someone as
anti-American and destructive as William Ayers. Plus, Ayers, his wife and their
comrades at the Weather Underground are cop-killers. And Obama doesn’t just know
him personally — he’s a close friend with Ayers.

Here is the “resume”
of an American terrorist:

7 October 1969 – Bombing of Haymarket Police
Statue in Chicago, apparently as a “kickoff” for the “Days of Rage” riots in the
city October 8-11, 1969. The Weathermen later claimed credit for the bombing in
their book, “Prairie Fire.”

8-11 October 1969 – The “Days of Rage” riots
occur in Chicago in which 287 Weatherman members from throughout the country
were arrested and a large amount of property damage was done.

6 December
1969 – Bombing of several Chicago Police cars parked in a precinct parking lot
at 3600 North Halsted Street, Chicago. The WUO stated in their book “Prairie
Fire” that they had did the explosion.

27-31 December 1969 – Weathermen
hold a “War Council” meeting in Flint, MI, where they finalize their plans to
submerge into an underground status from which they plan to commit strategic
acts of sabotage against the government. Thereafter they are called the “Weather
Underground Organization” (WUO).

13 February 1970 – Bombing of several
police vehicles of the Berkeley, California, Police Department .

16 February 1970 – Bombing of Golden Gate Park branch of the San Francisco Police
Department, killing one officer and injuring a number of other policemen.

6 March 1970 – Bombing in the 13th Police District of the Detroit,
Michigan. 34 sticks of dynamite are discovered. During February and early March,
1970, members of the WUO, led by Bill Ayers, are reported to be in Detroit,
during that period, for the purpose of bombing a police facility.

6 March 1970 – “bomb factory” located in New York’s Greenwich Village accidentally
explodes. WUO members die . The bomb was intended to be planted at a
non-commissioned officer’s dance at Fort Dix, New Jersey. The bomb was packed
with nails TO INFILICT MAXIMUM CASUALTIES UPON DETONATION.

http://www.postchronicle.com/commentary/article_212169015.shtml
Technorati –

Oh, Behold the “gentle critics” of the left…

September 1, 2008

Oh, Behold the “gentle critics” of the left…

Obama deals gently with Palin on equal pay issue
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080901/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_obama_palin

Critics: Palin used ‘Bridge…
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080831/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_bridge_to_nowhere

Can anyone at the MSM Yahoo-AP crowd explain to me how come anti-right-leftists are plain “critics” [were it reversed they would call the critics specifically in an identity: “right wingers” or Republicans… or Mccain supporters) and why they go so “gently” with Obama that is never gentle?

Technorati –

NPR’s IQ

August 19, 2008

NPR’s IQ

The Litmus test of NPR’s intelligence…

On August 18, 2008, Jonathan Capehart sitting in for Leonard Lopate Show – WNYC , http://www.WNYC.org (212 433 9292) [NPR’s outlet in NY] interviewed in the last part of of the first hour Liz from ‘The Daily News’, first Liz brushed off any doubts if NY Yorkers are behind Hillary, “everybody is for NY” – she “decided”, yet, Jonathan in his desperation and worry that Mccain might win NY (NPR is independent” of course…), asked her “but… there’s no chance Mccain can win NY, Right?” Liz was “struggling” with Obama’s loss from 20% to 10% then tried to spin about it suddenly she came up with a most stupid answer: “Mccain doesn’t even have an office here… his headquarters is based in NJ”… oh boy, is she that silly that she believes people don’t notice the childish “reasoning” of it? How far really is NJ from NY? NYC almost borders with NJ!

It’s almost like saying, Richardson VS. Dallas TX, La Jolla VS San Diego CA, Palo Alto VS San Jose CA, Fort Lauderdale VS Miami FL, Skokie VS Chicago IL, etc.
Even though they are two separate states, it’s more like Cincinnati OH VS Louisville KY.

For Jonathan it was “enough”, he was not only satisfied but so happy, thus ended the interview.

Technorati –


Where your tax money goes – to Liberal BS PBS – Clean up the 20% garbage at the PBS! Do not mix them with the majority of ‘good programming’, the “news” and current “editorial”

August 11, 2008

Where your tax money goes – to Liberal BS PBS
[August, 2008]

Clean up the 20% garbage at the PBS! Do not mix them with the majority of ‘good programming’, the “news” and current “editorial”
parts are totally unprofessional!

The PBS & NPR problem of having one sided biased agenda whenever reporting or editorializing news and current
events.

PBS says it’s “independent”, Huh?

PBS has a banner about ‘Vote 2008’ that describes itself as “independent”.

TIMING:

Can anyone come up with an explanation why the next 2 “documentaries” had
to be aired just so close to the elections?

1) Last weekend [beginning of August 2008], liberal Bill Moyers was busy in
his [Frontline] program on Reed’s scandalous past (with Abramov), where at the
end of it he makes sure to finish off with a “warning” line that : Jack Reed is
sponsoring a John Mccain weekend, Is that an important of the ‘Frontline’
“objective” documentary? or is it blatant anti-Mccain propaganda?

2) After above Bill Moyers ‘Frontline’ PBS had another anti Republican
bombshell, a film called “Bush’s War“, I couldn’t see all of it but at least two
comments:
A: Each time there’s a difference of opinion and two sides of the
coins are being brought up, the narrator “picks” the one he chooses to be the
“decisive” line.
B: When he comes to the pivotal points in the Iraq violence
he chooses the words: “resistance”, never the suitable ‘terrorists’ (or
other) term of thugs’ crimes against humanity, that are targeting unarmed men,
women & children, this attempt to make these low life criminals look like
some “political” movements, is not only dis-reporting but despicable effort of
butchers’-ass-licking, of the lowest of its kind.

Again, you can’t help but wonder why these damning films where
aired so soon to the elections if not the obvious to make people nauseous
of the Republican party.

THE SPIN ABOUT OIL

On Sunday [August 10, 2008] the same Bill Moyers on his ‘Frontline’ he made
the issue brought up by Newsweek about the ‘poverty business’, the phenomenon
that people find to make money of off poverty and off the poor.
A great
matter and case you might say, yes, until he starts to project his left bias, as
he has his guests over that start complaining about [the Democrats and] Obama’s
failure in the economy, Bill Moyers tries to shift the atmosphere to bash Mccain
instead, after making sure the guests are brought to the wind of
anti-Republicans he (feels assured enough so) he then shows a clip (by Foxnews)
of Newt Gingrich that he projects that within announcement of drilling (Drill
here, drill now) the gas prices will automatically fall, as speculators of the
oil stocks would be effected by it.

[Immediately, there’s a banner on the bottom with the words “The oil drilling debate”, How did the case against making profiting off of
poverty get altered?]
Bill asks the guest Dean Baker (of “CEPR“) if
that’s true, Mr. Becker answers that the projective oil we will be able to “get”
is small, whether this is accurate or not is not the issue but, still he hasn’t
answered the point raised by Mr. Gingrich which is that psychologically, the gas
price will fall down as soon as news of drilling gets the ‘go ahead’.

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/08082008/transcript3.html

Of course one sided Bill Moyers didn’t repeat and refocused the question,
he doesn’t want to hear the true answer, much less, he doesn’t want the American
people to hear the truth, that’s PBS – BS for you.

Truth is that gas prices already started to go down because of Mccain
pro-drilling and influencing Obama to agree partially to it.

The truth is that the control of our money to PBS by one small group [when
it comes to “news” and “editorials”, too bad they mix it in
with good programming, that makes it all even more venomous]
of radical
lefty “intellectuals” has been so unfair and so unjust for far too
long.

Technorati –













































































]
 

ABC = A BANGING CHEAP PROPAGANDA MACHINE

August 5, 2008

ABC = A BANGING CHEAP PROPAGANDA MACHINE

Another daily example of open and shameless media bias pro-Obama anti-Mccain.

Aug. 5, 2008 [7:AM] , Jake Tapper of ABC’s GMA (GoodMorningAmerica) presents what ABC (supposedly) “knows” to be true or false, analyzing Mccain vs Obama on the energy & gas crisis, first he presents McCain with a rage overtone and is very quick to throw the sticker “flipflop” followed by the “false” sticker twice with the loud sound effect of a ‘BANG’ in a wild speed.
Then as soon as he starts with Obama, all of a sudden the SPEED stops… all the ‘BANGS” are gone! the punches sound of a boxing match comes to a holt, as if with a click of a button he slows down with a romantic voice, nothing about “flipflopping” on Obama’s CHANGE of mind about oil drilling (this last weekend), heck, even Obama’s childish stupidity about “inflating tires” gets not just no belittling but is even being elevated to some level of a cheap propaganda of “respect”.
All
this is “finalized” by  Robin the anchor with a “thank you Jake for checking out the
facts”…

While the only fact is that McCain – American hero is the underdog vs the Obamawood actor.

Because it’s never about the issues, nor about facts vs fiction, it’s not about the “what” but about the “who”.

Hey, Haters at ABC, at least be smart enough to hide your fraudulent “journalism”!

Technorati –













































































]