You Must Watch ‘Obsession’ because CAIR doesn’t want you to know the truth about Radical Islam

September 24, 2008

You Must Watch ‘Obsession’ because CAIR doesn’t want you to know the truth about Radical Islam

Topics: Understanding Islam

Via Dan Riehl, I see that CAIR is once again “Outraged” – this time in Fla – and they want to shut down the distribution of copies of the movie, Obsession, being distributed in newspapers there. Apparently a few politically correct, highly ill informed, naive papers have refused to include the insert including one in North Carolina. Dan has the links to two videos to YouTube by CAIRtv in which the also obviously politically correct, highly ill-informed, naive newscasters play right into the hands of the Muslim activist group (with a highly dangerous agenda for America) and with proven ties to terrorists.

Dan has posted on the campaign and has done a review of Obsession here.

Now given that CAIR doesn’t want you to see the movie and just in case you haven’t received a free copy or somehow have failed to see it by now, please watch this 6 part youtube FoxNews film which Lionheart suggests is one of the best and most informative films you will see on the threat we in the civilized World face in relation to Islam’s Holy War against us (HT – Lionheart for posting the links to all six parts at YouTube): Fox News:The Threat of Radical Islam (Parts 1 – 6). I was fortunate enough to watch the entire Fox News special at the time of its airing and enjoyed every minute of it. And, of course, E.D. Hill as the announcer, made it all the more effective.

Part 1 – Obsession


Part 2 – Obsession


Part 3 – Obsession

Part 4 – Obsession

Part 5 – Obsession

Part 6 – Obsession

Website: Radical Islam’s War against the West

Current related:

Middle East professor says controversial Obsession movie “straightforward” (Via Robert Spencer at Jihad Watch):

Always refreshing to see a member of that bastion of Islamic apologetics — academia — actually being objective. More on this story. “Swift dispute, radical Muslims DVD flare scrutiny of Islam,” by Chris Casey for the Tribune, September 21:

James Lindsay, an associate professor of Middle Eastern history at CSU, takes an opposite view on “Obsession.” He believes it’s a straightforward look at radical Islam.

He said the producers are explicit that film is about the radical ideology within Islam, which is advanced by the Muslim Brotherhood, al-Qaida and other groups. The film’s introduction states that most Muslims are peaceful and don’t support terror.

The militant Islamic branch — which the film says makes up about 10 percent to 15 percent of a worldwide Muslim population of 1.2 billion, the world’s second-largest religion behind Christianity — has a conquest ideology, Lindsay said.

“It’s one of subjugating the world to their ideology. There is not room for another ideology, according to the radical Muslim ideology, and it’s frightening,” he said. “But it’s part and parcel of the ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood and the al-Qaida types that they want to impose their will on everyone.”[…]

Lindsay, the CSU professor, said the Muslims who flew the airplanes into the Twin Towers felt they were doing God’s work.

Muslims who say “jihad” means the struggle for personal betterment aren’t giving the full picture of what’s written in the classical text, he said. Rather, the text says the Islamic practitioner is preparing himself to be a better warrior.

“The idea of the jihad as laid out by extremists is one of the doctrines within the Quran itself,” Lindsay said. “It’s a fundamental tenet of Islamic religion and it has been in Islamic history — engaging in warfare against the enemies of Islam.”

Conflicts between the West and Islam are inevitable, Lindsay said, because the demands of Islamic law are in conflict with the West’s approach to law and religion. The Quran speaks of creating a society that’s obedient to God’s law, not obedient to men’s model, he said.

Lindsay believes the way to deal with Muslim immigrants — as in the case of the JBS Swift workers — is to explain how employment rules and policies operate in the United States. “I have no desire to make any accommodations to Islamic law, and that’s my opinion.”

Other current related: 15-year-old female would-be suicide bomber tells her story

http://www.hyscience.com/archives/understanding_islam/

‘Keep Islamic-hope Alive!’ – Iranians (Islamic Leaders) Hoping for ‘Muslim’ Obama Victory

September 8, 2008

Iranians (Islamic Leaders) Hoping for ‘Muslim’ Obama Victory

newsmax ^ Sep. 08 09
Iranians (Islamic Leaders) Hoping for ‘Muslim’ Obama Victory Iran’s leadership has expressed “great pleasure” at the prospect of a Barack Obama victory in November, according to Menashe Amir, the Iranian-born head of Radio Israel’s Persian language service. But Iranian President Ahmadinejad has said he doubts that the American establishment “will allow” Obama to win. “One of the Iranian religious leaders said if Obama will enter the White House, then Islam will conquer the heart of the American nation,” Amir told Isracast.com

http://news.newsmax.com/?Z64R.id3Wi4A7rM97wZwD3RZDxykxJUAZ
Technorati –

Resume Of A Terrorist: Obama’s Buddy Ayers

September 3, 2008

Resume Of A Terrorist: Obama’s Buddy Ayers
by Jim Kouri

Published:
Sep 2, 2008

While the likes of the New York Times, Washington Post, ABC,
NBC, CBS, CNN and other news organizations have their reporters digging for dirt
on Alaskan Gov. Sarah Palin, John McCain’s choice for vice president, their
savior-in-waiting Barack Obama is getting a free ride at the expense of truth.

It’s no secret that the denizens of America’s newsrooms want Obama
sitting in the Oval Office, but Americans are being purposely duped by the
Democrat National Committee’s volunteer publicists, formerly known as the
mainstream news media.

If it weren’t for talk radio and the blogosphere,
even what is known about Obama and his friend, former Weather Underground
domestic terrorist and leader William Ayers, would only be a paragraph or two in
the backpages of most newspapers, or a sentence or two on most TV and radio news
programs.

On Friday night, one of America’s top talk show hosts — who
happens to be an attorney and worked in the Reagan Justice Department as chief
of staff — recited a list of terrorist acts that would elicit envy from Osama
bin Laden. Mark Levin had his listeners glued to their radios or PCs as he read
the resume of a man who should be serving life in prison instead of enjoying a
tenured professorship at a major university and entertaining a possible US
President in his home.

Because of so-called “prosecutorial misconduct”
Ayers escaped what could have been a life-sentence.

As I write this
“resume of a terrorist,” I find it difficult to understand how a man who is
running for president of the United States would even know someone as
anti-American and destructive as William Ayers. Plus, Ayers, his wife and their
comrades at the Weather Underground are cop-killers. And Obama doesn’t just know
him personally — he’s a close friend with Ayers.

Here is the “resume”
of an American terrorist:

7 October 1969 – Bombing of Haymarket Police
Statue in Chicago, apparently as a “kickoff” for the “Days of Rage” riots in the
city October 8-11, 1969. The Weathermen later claimed credit for the bombing in
their book, “Prairie Fire.”

8-11 October 1969 – The “Days of Rage” riots
occur in Chicago in which 287 Weatherman members from throughout the country
were arrested and a large amount of property damage was done.

6 December
1969 – Bombing of several Chicago Police cars parked in a precinct parking lot
at 3600 North Halsted Street, Chicago. The WUO stated in their book “Prairie
Fire” that they had did the explosion.

27-31 December 1969 – Weathermen
hold a “War Council” meeting in Flint, MI, where they finalize their plans to
submerge into an underground status from which they plan to commit strategic
acts of sabotage against the government. Thereafter they are called the “Weather
Underground Organization” (WUO).

13 February 1970 – Bombing of several
police vehicles of the Berkeley, California, Police Department .

16 February 1970 – Bombing of Golden Gate Park branch of the San Francisco Police
Department, killing one officer and injuring a number of other policemen.

6 March 1970 – Bombing in the 13th Police District of the Detroit,
Michigan. 34 sticks of dynamite are discovered. During February and early March,
1970, members of the WUO, led by Bill Ayers, are reported to be in Detroit,
during that period, for the purpose of bombing a police facility.

6 March 1970 – “bomb factory” located in New York’s Greenwich Village accidentally
explodes. WUO members die . The bomb was intended to be planted at a
non-commissioned officer’s dance at Fort Dix, New Jersey. The bomb was packed
with nails TO INFILICT MAXIMUM CASUALTIES UPON DETONATION.

http://www.postchronicle.com/commentary/article_212169015.shtml
Technorati –

Oh, Behold the “gentle critics” of the left…

September 1, 2008

Oh, Behold the “gentle critics” of the left…

Obama deals gently with Palin on equal pay issue
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080901/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_obama_palin

Critics: Palin used ‘Bridge…
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080831/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_bridge_to_nowhere

Can anyone at the MSM Yahoo-AP crowd explain to me how come anti-right-leftists are plain “critics” [were it reversed they would call the critics specifically in an identity: “right wingers” or Republicans… or Mccain supporters) and why they go so “gently” with Obama that is never gentle?

Technorati –

An Obama Cartoon from the Times

August 30, 2008

An Obama Cartoon from the Times

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/cartoon/

Typical Arab Muslim bigot writes: “Why Arab/Muslim Americans should not vote for Obama”

August 30, 2008

Typical Arab Muslim bigot writes: “Why Arab/Muslim Americans should not vote for Obama”

Oh no, I think we are going to shed tears…

Why Arab/Muslim Americans should not vote for Obama

link

One of the most typical points were of course Obama’s pledge to defend Israel against Islamic genocide the Arab writer calls it a move against “peace”, when Arab Muslim “peace” (of course) means the usual, more massacres. Don’t you love it when these warriors utter the “peace” word?

Technorati –

Need “input” on Obama’s plan

August 29, 2008

Need “input” on Obama’s plan…

Barack Obama in his speech:

You don’t protect Israel and deter Iran just by talking tough in Washington.

http://www.nbc4.com/politics/17329645/detail.html

Does this mean that if you talk less tough [like Obamanation] you get better “results” in protecting Israel from Islamists’ genocide?


Technorati –

Obama unfit for president

August 24, 2008

Obama unfit for president

Pastor Rick Warren had back-to-back interviews with Barack Obama and John McCain at the Saddleback Faith Forum. The answers illustrated the differences between the two.

When asked about the existence of evil and what to do about it, Obama acknowledged the existence of evil and the necessity to oppose it. Then he did what most liberals do, unequivocally equated America itself with evil: “You know a lot of evil has been perpetrated based on the claim that we were trying to confront evil: … You know, just because we think our intentions are good doesn’t mean that we’re going to be doing good.”

McCain’s response was simple and direct on the problem of evil: “Defeat it.”

Obama’s response illustrates the liberal premise that America is evil and, therefore, has no gravitas or right to fight evil elsewhere.

Obama simply cannot acknowledge that there is a vast difference between the Osama bin Ladens and the Ayman al-Zawahiris of the world and us. Instead, he effectively erects a facade of moral equivalence between Islamofascism and our attempt to defeat it.

That is just one reason (out of many) as to why Obama is not fit to be president.

James C. Zoes

http://www.nwherald.com/articles/2008/08/22/
opinion/letters/doc48af5242c5de9071921031.txt

Technorati –

No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives (Obama friend, William Ayers – 9-11-2001)

August 23, 2008

No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives (Obama friend, William Ayers – 9-11-2001)

NYTimes ^ 9-11-01 Dinitia Smith

In a Memoir of Sorts, a War Protester Talks of Life With the Weathermen
”I don’t regret setting bombs,” Bill Ayers said. ”I feel we didn’t do enough.”

Mr. Ayers, who spent the 1970’s as a fugitive in the Weather Underground, was sitting in the kitchen of his big turn-of-the-19th-century stone house in the Hyde Park district of Chicago.
The long curly locks in his Wanted poster are shorn, though he wears earrings. He still has tattooed on his neck the rainbow-and-lightning Weathermen logo that appeared on letters taking responsibility for bombings. And he still has the ebullient, ingratiating manner, the apparently intense interest in other people, that made him a charismatic figure in the radical student movement.

Now he has written a book, ”Fugitive Days” (Beacon Press, September). Mr. Ayers, who is 56, calls it a memoir, somewhat coyly perhaps, since he also says some of it is fiction.
He writes that he participated in the bombings of New York City Police Headquarters in 1970, of the Capitol building in 1971, the Pentagon in 1972.

But Mr. Ayers also seems to want to have it both ways, taking responsibility for daring acts in his youth, then deflecting it.

”Is this, then, the truth?,” he writes. ”Not exactly. Although it feels entirely honest to me.”

(Excerpt) Read more at http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?
res=9F02E1DE1438F932A2575AC0A9679C8B63

———

See also:
So Who Is This Bill Ayers?? – http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/04/17/so-who-is-this-bill-ayers/

——–

Obama Needs to Explain His Ties to William Ayers
http://www.usnews.com/blogs/barone/
2008/8/22/obama-needs-to-
explain-his-ties-to-william-ayers.html?s_cid=rss:barone:obama-
needs-to-explain-his-ties-to-william-ayers

——–

‘Fact Checker’

Chicago Police photos of William Ayers in 1968

“William Ayers, in the age of terrorism, will be Barack Obama’s Willie Horton.”

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/02/obamas_weatherman_connection.html

Technorati –

How many ‘Nation Of Islam [fascists]’ will work with Obama, if elected?

August 20, 2008
January 30, 2008

EXCLUSIVE – Obama’s Nation of Islam Staffers, Edward Said & “Inflexible Jews” Causing Mid-East Conflict: An Obama Insider Reveals the Real Barack

Printer Friendly

By Debbie SchlusselCopyright 2008

**** EXCLUSIVE: Must Cite Debbie Schlussel and/or DebbieSchlussel.com ****

Responding to criticism by Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen, Barack Obama declared his strong opposition to Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan:

I decry racism and anti-Semitism in every form and strongly condemn the anti-Semitic statements made by Minister Farrakhan.

Obama also went on to condemn his Church’s award to Farrakhan and his minister’s tight relationship with him.

But a former Obama insider says that Obama’s sudden aversion to NOI and Farrakhan is belied by the fact that Obama employed and continues to employ several Farrakhan acolytes in high positions on his Illinois and U.S. Senate campaign and office staffs. I have verified that this person–who agreed to talk on the condition of anonymity–held a key position in the Obama campaign. The insider was so close to Senator Obama that they frequently personally discussed and exchanged direct e-mail messages on campaign and policy matters. This person is not connected with the Clintons and is not a disgruntled employee.

barackobamaedwardsaid.jpg

barackobamaedwardsaid2.jpg
Barack Hussein & Michelle Obama with Palestinian Activist, PLO/Arafat Advisor Edward Said @ Arab Fundraiser
(Photos From Electronic Intifada)

The insider says he frequently objected to Mr. Obama’s placement of Cynthia K. Miller, a member of the Nation of Islam, as the Treasurer of his U.S. Senate campaign. When I contacted Miller, now a Chicago real estate agent, to verify whether she was a member of the Nation of Islam and whether she shared Louis Farrakhan’s bigoted views about Jews, she responded, “None of your business! Where are you going with this?” She said her resignation as Obama’s treasurer had nothing to do with her Nation of Islam ties. Then, she hung up.

The Obama insider says he also objected to Obama’s involvement with Jennifer Mason, whom he says is also a member of the Nation of Islam. Mason is Obama’s Director of Constituent Services in his U.S. Senate office and is also in charge of selecting Obama’s Senate interns. She did not respond to repeated calls for comment.

But it’s not just that he employed these individuals in positions of power in his office, it’s that when the former associate raised objections, he says Mr. Obama’s position was that he saw nothing wrong with the Nation of Islam and didn’t think it was a problem. If true–and the fact that Ms. Mason still holds her prominent Obama Senate staff position bears that out–Obama’s condemnation of Farrakhan, this month, is phony.

But the insider says there is more to it than that. Obama’s Illinois State Senate district consisted of prime Nation of Islam territory, including Hyde Park, home to Farrakhan’s mansion. It is not possible, Illinois politicos say, to win that district without the blessing of the NOI leader. NOI members, including consultant Shakir Muhammad, held important roles in the Obama state senate campaign.

How many Nation of Islam members will work in an Obama White House?

Then, there is the issue of Israel. When Obama first ran for the U.S. Senate, he gave militant responses to the Chicago Jewish News about Israel. Obama denounced Israel’s fence–which he called a “wall” and “barrier to peace”–to keep out terrorists and favored working with Yasser Arafat. When members of the Chicago Jewish community circulated his responses, Obama said that the answers were not his positions, but the work of a low-level intern. He submitted new answers. But that was a lie, the insider says. In fact, they were the work of Obama’s Policy Director, Audra Wilson. Moreover, Obama told the insider that he blamed the Mideast conflict on the Jews:

Barack told me that he felt that Jewish community was too inflexible, and that was why the situation in the Mideast could not be resolved.

This is the man who says in a new campaign ad that Hillary Clinton will say anything but change nothing. Barack Obama will say anything, but change his answers.

Palestinian activist and Islamist Ali Abunimah, who was a close friend of Obama’s, attended an Arab fundraiser at which the late Edward Said–plagiarist, fabricator, and prominent PLO/Arafat advisor–was the keynote speaker, and at which the Obamas were notably in attendance. Pictures on Abunimah’s site, posted above, show Obama and wife, Michelle, sitting next to Said and engaging in conversation. Abunimah, in a must-read article, says the Senator has since “changed” his proclaimed views from those he expressed privately, in order to get Jewish donors and votes.

And he has succeeded in spades. Lee Rosenberg a top Illinois official of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the pro-Israel lobby is a big Obama donor. Ditto for former national AIPAC official Bob Asher. And Penny Pritzker of the pro-Israel family that owns Hyatt hotels. And there are so many others who have bought in to Obama’s newly pro-Israel views. The insider says Obama pulled the wool over their eyes.

Then, there’s Bettylu Saltzman, also Jewish and one of Obama’s first major supporters and donors. She is a major Peace Now devotee, officer of the far-left, pro-capitulation New Israel Fund, and wrote a letter to a Chicago newspaper praising Jimmy Carter’s book calling Israel an apartheid state. The Obama insider says she has Obama’s ear on the Mideast and “will be a major policy person for Barack. Very dangerous.”

The insider points to Mr. Obama’s changing views in Iraq as another area of uncertainty. He has highlighted his opposition to the War in Iraq. The insider says there is strong speculation that Obama attempted to get his crony, Federal Indictee Tony Rezko, a contract to build a nuclear power plant in the new Iraq. Rezko, a Syrian Arab who helped Obama in a deal to purchase his home, was in a partnership with NOI founder Elijah Muhammad’s son, Jabir.

Barack Obama can denounce Louis Farrakhan ad infinitum. But with supporters like Ms. Saltzman, high-level staffers who are Nation of Islam members, and constantly morphing views on Israel merely for donor appeal, a Barack Obama White House bodes poorly both for Israel and–far more important–for America.

Posted by Debbie at January 30, 2008 10:07 AM

http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2008/01/obamas_nation_o.html

Technorati –